I did have target "Nearest to orb" set, but for some reason at this point my Gems had ideas of their own.
I only stopped because my graphics was glitching and the towers did not appear to be firing or when they did fire - they appeared to be targeting structures mainly.
I was enraging Swarmling waves to 999 mobs and to around 500 with Reavers. I was very conservative with enraging waves, only starting around wave 30, with 2 level 1 gems and also not enraging Giants waves.Įventually I had 4 traps in a row, surrounded by amps and quite a few kill towers as well. I also used a couple of slow gems in towers to help out the traps. Keep amp gems around 2 levels behind the main gem in order to keep mana requirements manageable. I concentrated on getting 6 Amps around my trap as soon as I could. I did not try gem weaving, but you should probably do it if you know how. Combined to Level 4 gemĪmp Trap gem was: Red, Orange Amp Kill gem was: Red, Yellow Combined to Level 4 gem Kill gem was: 1 Red, 3 white, 4 yellow. Initially all I had down was a trap and a kill tower. Not sure when I started enraging waves but probably not much before wave 30. (Contains 13 figures of data.2k mana is not enough to get set up from wave 1, so the idea is to just survive and then slowly build up the infrastructure. Findings suggest continuation of the program with attention given to 7 recommendations. Resulted indicated that (1) of the 237 treatment group pupils, 218 (92%) displayed over time each of the 3 strategic processing behaviors (monitoring reading, constructing meaning, and integrating sources of information) (2) of the 237 pupils in the treatment group retention data were available for 232 pupils of these 232 pupils, 220 (94.8%) were not retained (criterion was 75.0%) (3) of the treatment group of 237 pupils, 209 (88.2%) read 5 or more books at text reading level 8 or above (criterion was 50.0%) (4) 4.6% of the 219 Total Reading evaluation sample students were at grade level, while 90% were below the 37th percentile and still eligible for Chapter 1 services (5) of the 221 Reading Comprehension evaluation sample pupils, 8.1% were at grade level, while 80.5% were below the 37th percentile (6) the average normal curve equivalent (NCE) score for the 219 Total Reading evaluation sample pupils was 31.2 NCEs, and the average NCE score for the 221 Reading Comprehension sample on the posttest was 35.5 NCEs and (7) 648 different parents or guardians were involved in some way with the program. The treatment group consisted of the 237 pupils who were either discontinued (161) or received 60 or more lessons but not discontinued (76). Data included results of administration of Metropolitan Achievement Tests and Scott Foresman text reading level testing. The program featured individualized one-on-one lessons provided by 69 specially trained teachers serving 546 pupils. A study evaluated the effectiveness of the 1994-95 Reading Recovery program as implemented in the Columbus, Ohio, public schools.
0 kommentar(er)
